On Sep 16, 2009, at 8:37 AM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2009-07-30 13:37:16 -0700, prent...@cisco.com wrote:
This patch changes plpgsql IN parameters so they are mutable.
Makes sense, applies fine, works fine.
How does this compare with PLSQL? I know in Ada an IN argument is in
effect a constant. I understand the utility, because I occasionally
knock against this restriction, but if it's incompatible with PLSQL
I think we should think about it more carefully.
At worst it's an upward-compatible extension, or am I wrong? If it's
useful, which I think it is, what's the harm?
...Robert
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
