Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
So here are the major points about this patch: - it's missing the returns declaration syntax (default value could be returns void?) - it would be much more friendly to users if it had a default output for queries, the returned object seems a good fit
Really? That wasn't my expectation at all. I expected that the code would in effect be always returning void. I think you're moving the goalposts a bit here. I don't think we need a RETURNS clause on it for it to be useful.
cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
