On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Jaime Casanova > <jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec> wrote: >> have anyone better ideas about the name? if not, then go with >> pg_largeobject_meta > > I don't think there's anything wrong with calling it metadata. That > seems to leave the door open to future things we might want to do, > without restricting it to security-related settings or whatever. But > I don't see any reason to abbreviate it either - I'd go with > pg_largeobject_metadata rather than just pg_largeobject_meta. >
ok! metadata is self explanatory meta is not... at least not for someone that his mother tongue is spanish and think of "meta" like in "goal" ;) -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
