On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Bernd Helmle <[email protected]> wrote: > > > --On 23. September 2009 14:10:39 -0400 Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > >> FWIW, I looked the patch over quickly, and I think it will be fine once >> Bernd's comments are addressed. In particular I agree with the >> objection to the name "pg_setting" as being confusingly close to >> "pg_settings". But "pg_user_setting" isn't better. Maybe >> "pg_db_role_settings"? > > Jepp, that's better, +1 from me. > > I'm done with this, too, so i will mark this as "Returned with Feedback", if > no one objects?
It can be marked "Waiting on Author" if it's going to be reworked in the next few days. If no plans to rework, or if the rework doesn't materialize, then "Returned with Feedback". ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
