Hi all, I am using psqlodbc to connect to PostgreSQL8.2.4 server on Linux. The manual says "BEGIN TRANSACATION" is equlvalent to "START TRANSACTION", but it turns out that they throw different error message and have different effect to subsequent queries.
I have a table "CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE ooid (oid_ INTEGER NOT NULL);" The autocommit is set to on. When inserting into ooid with a NULL value within a transaction, I expect the transaction is aborted and rollback is executed automatically. With the transaction started by "BEGIN TRANSACTION", PostgreSQL runs as expected. The server log shows error message is "ERROR: null value in column "oid_" violates not-null constraint", and any following query runs well. ----- 2009-09-24 13:53:13 JST jmdb postgres STATEMENT: BEGIN TRANSACTION; DELETE FROM pid; INSERT INTO pid VALUES (9765); DELETE FROM jid; INSERT INTO jid VALUES (644); DELETE FROM did; INSERT INTO did VALUES (2029); DELETE FROM ooid; INSERT INTO ooid (SELECT COALESCE( (SELECT Document.oid_ FROM Document, Job WHERE Document.DocNum = (SELECT DocNum FROM did) AND Job.jobId = (SELECT jobId FROM jid) AND Document.memberOf_ = Job.oid_ AND Job.assignedTo_ = (SELECT PrinterObjId FROM pid)), NULL)); update Document set DocName=NULL where Document.oid_=(SELECT oid_ FROM ooid);update Document set DocLastModified = CURRENT_TIMESTAMP where Document.oid_=(SELECT oid_ FROM ooid); COMMIT; 2009-09-24 13:53:17 JST jmdb postgres ERROR: null value in column "oid_" violates not-null constraint ----- When the transaction is started by "START TRANSACTION", the error message is different, and all following query failed with the same error message "ERROR: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block". ----- 2009-09-24 13:53:59 JST jmdb postgres STATEMENT: START TRANSACTION; DELETE FROM pid; INSERT INTO pid VALUES (9765); DELETE FROM jid; INSERT INTO jid VALUES (779); DELETE FROM did; INSERT INTO did VALUES (2530); DELETE FROM ooid; INSERT INTO ooid (SELECT COALESCE( (SELECT Document.oid_ FROM Document, Job WHERE Document.DocNum = (SELECT DocNum FROM did) AND Job.jobId = (SELECT jobId FROM jid) AND Document.memberOf_ = Job.oid_ AND Job.assignedTo_ = (SELECT PrinterObjId FROM pid)), NULL)); update Document set DocName=NULL where Document.oid_=(SELECT oid_ FROM ooid);update Document set DocLastModified = CURRENT_TIMESTAMP where Document.oid_=(SELECT oid_ FROM ooid); COMMIT; 2009-09-24 13:53:59 JST jmdb postgres ERROR: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block 2009-09-24 13:53:59 JST jmdb postgres STATEMENT: SELECT oid_,DocName FROM DocView WHERE DocNum=2530 and DocJobId=779 and pid_=0 FOR READ ONLY 2009-09-24 13:53:59 JST jmdb postgres ERROR: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block 2009-09-24 13:53:59 JST jmdb postgres STATEMENT: DELETE FROM Printer WHERE PrinterObjId=0; 2009-09-24 13:53:59 JST jmdb postgres ERROR: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block ----- I searched archives, but no related comment is found. Should I do some setting on server to make the "START TRANSACTION" act as "BEGIN TRANSACTION"? Thank you. Greetings, Ning Xie -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
