On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 00:18 +0300, Marko Kreen wrote: > On 9/26/09, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Maybe it doesn't "need" to know, but I think it would be disastrous from > > a maintenance standpoint to not keep the two sets of flex rules in > > strict correspondence. It would soon become unclear whether or how to > > apply changes in the backend lexer to psql. > > Patch attached.
That patch results in the following message from flex: psqlscan.l:1039: warning, -s option given but default rule can be matched -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
