On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 16:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: >> > Then why not send everything to syslog and have syslog filter it to the >> > places you want to? That is what syslog is for, after all. >> >> We send all syslog output with the same identifier/priority/facility, >> so there's not a lot of hope of getting syslog to do any useful >> filtering (at least not with the versions of syslog I'm familiar with). > > Time to upgrade then. ;-) For example, the default syslog in Fedora has > been rsyslog since Fedora 8, and that one can do a lot more than just > filter by identifier/priority/facility. syslog-ng is another popular > example for a more featureful syslog.
Presumably csvlog would be good for these sorts of things too, no? The whole point is it's machine-readable. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
