daveg escribió: > I work with Kunal and have been looking into this. It appears to be the same > as the bug described in: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-09/msg00355.php > > as I have localized it to a NULL pointer deference in > RelationCacheInitializePhase2() as well. Tom speculates in: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-09/msg00372.php > > that large numbers of table drops might trigger this. The system in question > creates and drops temp tables at a high rate which tends to confirm this.
Did you test the patch posted by Tom? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
