Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 10:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> comet_moth, gothic_moth: these are failing the new plpython_unicode
>> test
>> in locale cs_CZ.ISO8859-2. Somebody needs to do something about that.
>> If it's left to me I'll probably just remove the test that has
>> multiple
>> results.
> This is, at first glance, not a valid variant result. It's a genuine
> failure that needs investigation. I can't reproduce the problem with
> the equivalent locale on Linux, so Zdenek might need to look into it.
Uh, I can reproduce it just fine on Fedora 11, and OS X too. These
are running python 2.6 and 2.6.1 respectively ... maybe the behavior
is python version dependent?
As far as I can tell, PLyObject_ToDatum is invoking PLyUnicode_Str and
then PyString_AsString, and what it gets back from the latter is
(in C string notation) "\200\0". Possibly what this means is that
python thinks that that is the correct LATIN2 representation of
\u0080.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
