Robert Haas írta: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Boszormenyi Zoltan <z...@cybertec.at> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Michael Meskes írta: >> >>> It is accepted either way. I was just pointing out that it might be easier >>> to >>> review/commit at least parts of your patches if they can be applied >>> seperately. >>> >>> >> I have split up (and cleaned up a little) the dynamic >> cursorname patch into smaller logical, easier-to-review >> pieces. Descriptions below. >> >> ... >> After every patch (except 4) both the core and ecpg >> "make check" are successful. >> > > It would've been nice if you'd changed the subject line before posting these. >
At 3am, I forgot this. :( I hope the archive threading doesn't break and my previous mail will be referenced by this one. > Also, please update commitfest.postgresql.org appropriately. > I just did, thanks for the reminder. Best regards, Zoltán Böszörményi -- Bible has answers for everything. Proof: "But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil." (Matthew 5:37) - basics of digital technology. "May your kingdom come" - superficial description of plate tectonics ---------------------------------- Zoltán Böszörményi Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH http://www.postgresql.at/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
