Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I don't see how that helps at all. The objective of lock counters was to > know if we can skip acquiring an LWlock on all lock partitions. This > change keeps the lock counters yet acquires the locks we were trying to > avoid. This change needs some justification since it is not a bug fix.
[ scratches head ... ] Why is hot standby messing with this sort of thing at all? It sounds like a performance optimization that should be considered separately, and *later*. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers