Jaime Casanova wrote: > now i think that what Euler shows me [1] is a fair compromise (this is > to allow this only when in standalone mode with system catalogs > allowed) otherwise we will have diferent behaviour for specific > (random) catalogs... > > [1] > http://listas.postgresql.org.br/pipermail/pgbr-geral/2009-March/014374.html
Hmm, I don't necessarily agree that having the system effectively shut down for the duration of the pg_largeobject move is a good idea. I don't agree that pg_largeobject is a random catalog either -- it is, in fact, the only catalog in which an interesting size is to be expected. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
