2009/10/7 Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net>: > On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 22:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> In short: while I haven't looked at the patch, I think Peter may be >> steering you in the wrong direction. >> >> In cases where you do have related functions, I suggest having >> SQL-callable V1 functions that absorb their arguments in this >> style, and then have them call a common subroutine that's a plain >> C function. > > Yeah, that's what he did. So forget what I said. :-) >
What's the current status of this patch in the commitfest process? I see the last version posted by the author was on 14 Sep and there's been some discussion since then, but no new patch version has surfaced. Are we waiting on a new version of the patch, or is there more review of the existing version yet to be done? The status of the patch on the commitfest app is still "Needs Review", but I'm not sure whether that is accurate. Cheers, BJ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers