Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > My (limited) experience is that it's usually better to get something > incremental committed, even if it's not what you really want. You can > always take another crack at the remaining issues later, but if the > whole patch gets shot down then you are out of luck.
Yeah, that makes sense. But the partial change should also be a "long-term solution" ;-). It is hard to determine whether the partial change is a good solution until the whole features works as expected (at least partially). Regards, --- ITAGAKI Takahiro NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
