2009/10/19 Stephen Frost <[email protected]>: > * Pavel Stehule ([email protected]) wrote: >> Superuser permission could not be a problem. Simple security definer >> function can do it. > > Then you've defeated the point of making it superuser-only.
no. Because when I write security definer function, then I explicitly allow an writing for some roles. When I don't write this function, then GUC is secure. Pavel > > I don't think that changing the app name deserves a warning, to be > perfectly honest. Notice should be sufficient. > > Thanks, > > Stephen > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkrceMsACgkQrzgMPqB3kihrpwCePXXJLxXIpvfHF0fMXbO6Pn94 > uJcAn2cnT97QNqeRW2coKRDZfWVKaXxz > =xvXs > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
