On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Jaime Casanova <jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >> ISTM we should apply to OSI for approval of our licence, so we can then >> refer to it as the PostgreSQL licence. >> > > IMHO and not being a lawyer, this is the only reason for anyone to > think in change our license i think... > even in the case both licenses are "roughly equivalent", because users > are afraid of any changes. if we simply change our license for no good > reason we will have a ton of questions about if PostgreSQL is being > sold just as MySQL was...
Changing the licence is *not* going to happen. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com PGDay.EU 2009 Conference: http://2009.pgday.eu/start -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
