On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > All that we have to do to fix the first one is to put the LockRows node > below the Limit node instead of above it. The solution for the second > one is to also put LockRows underneath the Sort node, and to regard its > output as unsorted so that a Sort node will certainly be generated. > (This in turn implies that we should prefer the cheapest-total plan > for the rest of the query.)
I'm not following how this would work. Would it mean that every record would end up being locked? -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
