Greg Stark <gsst...@mit.edu> writes: > Still far from convinced on that one. But effective_io_concurrency > should be included even in the first pass.
I think a design that is limited to a prespecified set of GUCs is
broken by definition. It'd be better to make it work like
ALTER DATABASE SET.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
