On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> If it doesn't have any effect anyway, what's the virtue of back-patching it? > > Because 8.4 just fails in cases where we can easily allow it to work > according to the new definition. Right now, if you want to use FOR > UPDATE in a query that has WITHs, you have to carefully write > FOR UPDATE OF x,y,z,... for all the non-WITH relations.
Oh, I see. Well, that seems like it makes sense to me, then. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
