Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... For the moment I've worked
>> around this by putting the typedef into nodes/params.h itself, but I
>> can't say I find that a pleasing solution. Has anyone got a better
>> idea? Should we make a parser/something header that just provides that
>> typedef?
> Hmm ... if you create the new include file, is that going to avoid
> having to include params.h in plancache.h?
Well, it'd include the new file instead of params.h.
> If not, I don't think there's much point in having a new file (other
> than the typedef just not fitting in params.h).
Yeah, what's bothering me is that it just doesn't fit there --- doesn't
seem to satisfy the POLA. But I guess there are plenty of bigger
issues than that in our code base.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
