On Nov 5, 2009, at 10:24 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
One thing I'm not sure of is whether to keep the implicit row type in that case. That is, would the above command sequence still create a "persons" type? We could keep that so as to preserve the property "a table always has a row type of the same name"
+1 for keeping it.
Thoughts?
Any plans to allow the specification of multiple types to define the table?
"CREATE TABLE employee OF employee_data_type, persons_data_type;" -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
