On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 22:03 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > Don't think that name is very useful either... sounds like you want to > exclude operators, which is why I got lost in the first place. I'd call > them "generic exclusion constraints" or "user-defined exclusion > constraints". Sorry for this.
Either of those names are fine with me, too. The current name is a somewhat shortened version of the name "operator-based exclusion constraints", so we can also just use that name. Or, just "exclusion constraints". I'll leave the current patch as-is for now, and wait for some reviewer comments. This is purely a documentation issue, so there are bound to be a few of these things that I can clarify at once. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers