Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Josh Berkus <[email protected]> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Wouldn't per *tablespace* costs make more sense?
> >
> > --Josh
>
> Yes, we already had several votes in favor of that approach. See upthread.
Added to TODO:
Allow per-tablespace random_page_cost
* http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg01128.php
--
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
