Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > A more radical approach would be for the server to refuse to start > if a setting is set in more than one file, and for the server to > report both locations. That would reduce the guesswork about > problems. -1 I see that as a big step backward. As mentioned earlier in the thread, we use an include at the end of postgresql.conf to point to a file with any overrides from our standard configuration. Without the ability to do that, managing 200 clusters would be harder. I would not complain if the server logged duplicates. (That would actually be a minor blessing, as the startup would log all our deviations from standard -- at least if our standard had an explicit entry.) -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
