On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 12:35 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > While reading through the patch for what must be the 100th time by now,
:-) > it occurred to me that this comment in heap_xlog_freeze: > > + /* > + * Freezing tuples does not require conflict processing > + */ > > is plain wrong. In the master, we can freeze the xmin of a tuple that's > not yet visible to all read-only transactions in the standby. We do need > conflict processing there. I agree. Hmph, I wonder why I thought otherwise? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
