Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes: > Should the standby also have to follow the WAL rule during recovery? > The current patch doesn't care about the write order of the data page > and WAL in the standby. So, after both servers fail, restarting the > ex-standby by itself might corrupt the data.
Surely the receiver should fsync the WAL itself to disk before acknowledging it. Assuming you've done that, I don't see any corruption risk. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers