Tom Lane wrote: > Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > The set of patches I have the least feel for are the five ECPG > > submissions, some of which were reviewed already. I would particularly > > appreciate any early information reviewers might provide about their > > capability/willingness to work on that set. Those are not so easy to > > just split among multiple people due to how they relate to one another. > > AFAIK the ecpg patches are all waiting on Michael Meskes to have time > to review/commit them. ecpg is pretty much his turf and no other > committers are likely to touch these patches. If anyone really wants > to review them, of course, that's fine ... but I don't think you should > assign them to someone just because the CF process says to.
FWIW I committed the parts of one of these patches that touched the core grammar mostly, because I think those might have been holding Michael back a bit. Hopefully that'll make it easier for him to review the rest. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
