Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Albert Cervera i Areny > <alb...@nan-tic.com> wrote: > > A Dijous, 12 de novembre de 2009, Euler Taveira de Oliveira va escriure: > >> Simon Riggs escreveu: > >> > So, I > >> > propose that we simply ignore patches from developers until they have > >> > done sufficient review to be allowed to develop again. > >> > >> Is it really impolite for a first-contributor, no? > >> > > > > I don't think so, as long as it's properly explained. > > Personally, I would not propose to impose this rule of first-time > contributors, or even second-time contributors. But by about patch #3 > I think everyone should be pitching in.
I hate to ask, but how would we enforce this? Do we no longer apply patches for 3rd-time submitters who have not reviewed? That seems to be hurting us more than them. Are we prepared to discard valid patches for this reason? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
