On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 08:47 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > We do ask people to write docs, but I > don't think we will reject patches if people don't supply docs.
Yes, that is a good example. It's "a rule", plain and simple. Nobody gets their spleen removed for breaking it, yet it is still somehow enforced. I find it strange that suggesting a new rule is opposed on the general basis that *any* rule cannot be enforced; surely therefore we cannot have new rules at all, ever? We clearly do have new rules from time to time. So what's wrong with this new rule? Should we update the FAQ to say, "enclosing docs with a patch is a rule, but actually its not really and you only suffer mild rebuke if you break it and can therefore be ignored"? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
