"Greg Sabino Mullane" <[email protected]> writes:
> Talk of efficiency also seems silly here - using
> shared memory is already way more efficient than our current listen/notify
> system.
Except that the proposed implementation spills to disk. Particularly if
it has to have support for large payloads, it could very well end up
being a lot SLOWER than what we have now.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
