Peter Eisentraut wrote: > The patch is pretty straightforward, > but does anyone else actually want this? Comments? I agree that the initdb name seems odd next to the other executable names, but the functionality seems a little out of place to me in pg_ctl. The other options all correspond (more or less) to LSB init script actions (and we've been talking about the desirability of making that a closer fit); while this is something which would *not be appropriate* in an init script. We could filter this option out in the script, but it seemed like you wanted to keep the script as short and simple as possible.... -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
