On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 20:37 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: > > But a > > query getting canceled because it touches a lot of tables sounds more > > like a limitation than an outright bug, > > It's not that the query might get canceled. It will abort WAL recovery, > kill all backends, and bring the whole standby down.
Hmm, I think the incredible exploding Hot Standby is overstating this somewhat. We can improve the error handling for this rare case for which a simple workaround exists, but it seems like we should punt to phase 2. You agree there should be two phases? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
