2009/11/16 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > The real problem with the entry that George picked up on was that it was > misdescribed and mislabeled as easy because whoever put it in ignored > the fact that there was not a consensus to do a half-baked fix ... > this is a problem with a wiki TODO list :-(
Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that it's a problem with *any* TODO list? I don't see what the wiki has to do with it. Garbage in, garbage out. A poorly described item will always be trouble regardless of what form it is in. However, I'm not sure how productive the [E]asy marker can really be. Items end up on the TODO generally because a) we couldn't settle on a way forward, or b) nobody was keen to do it right away. There just aren't many genuinely "easy" items in there, easy ones usually get done right away. Cheers, BJ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
