On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On ons, 2009-11-25 at 22:15 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 22:07, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >> > On ons, 2009-11-25 at 16:27 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >> Attached is a patch which adds a chapter to git in our documentation, >> >> around where we have several chapters about cvs today. It also removes >> >> a few very out of date comments about cvs >> > >> > I think this whole chapter could be removed and the relevant information >> > added to the web site or the wiki. >> > >> > (Btw., it's spelled Git, not GIT.) >> >> Completely, or replaced with a reference to pages on the web/wiki? > > I think the appendix in question could be removed completely, if the > content is adequately covered elsewhere. > > In the installation instructions chapter, there is a section "Getting > the Source", which could warrant a link or reference to the appropriate > instructions on the web site.
I have to say I'm not really impressed by the idea of removing things from our documentation and replacing them with pages on the wiki. The documentation is better-written and easier to navigate. Yeah, the part about 28K modems is pretty silly, but we can fix that without throwing the baby out with the bathwater... ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
