Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> writes:
> OK - something like this? Should keep non-printable/control characters
> out of logs too...

Personally I'd use guc_strdup and then modify the string in-place,
but that's just a matter of taste I guess.  Otherwise it seems
reasonable.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to