On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 11:14:54AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Meskes <mes...@postgresql.org> writes: > > I wrote a hackish little script that checks if all rules in ecpg.addons are > > indeed used to create the precompiler's parser to catch renamed symbol and > > similar changes. Now I wonder whether this should be added to the build > > process. If it is, the buildfarm will catch every such change, not just the > > ones breaking the regression tests. However, this might also make the > > buildfarm > > become red if only a very minor and unimportant change is not syncronized. > > > Any comment? > > The point of the buildfarm is to catch mistakes ...
Okay, committed. As you guys know I don't really speak perl, so feel free to go in and fix whatever stupid perl mistake I made. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype: michaelmeskes, Jabber: mes...@jabber.org VfL Borussia! Forca Barca! Go SF 49ers! Use: Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
