Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[email protected]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> The discussion I saw suggested that you need such a patch at both ends.
> and likely requires a restart of both postgresql and slony afterwards... Actually, after looking through the available info about this: https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/ekr/draft-rescorla-tls-renegotiate.txt I think my comment above is wrong. It is useful to patch the *server*-side library to reject a renegotiation request. Applying that patch on the client side, however, is useless and simply breaks things. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
