Hi, Le 29 nov. 2009 à 18:22, Tom Lane a écrit : >> I think we should use GUC_NO_RESET_ALL. > > I agree with you, but it seems we have at least as many votes to not do > that. Any other votes out there?
Driven by the pooler use case (pgbouncer, even), I'd say RESET ALL should reset also the application name. And the connection value is not tied any more to something sensible as soon as you have pooling in there... Regards, -- dim -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
