Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > >> As I have observed before, I think we need some infrastructure to help > >> committers claim items, so we don't duplicate work. > > > > Robert acknowledged the need for a "claimed by committer" field in the > > fest application, but he hasn't got round to it yet. ?In the meantime > > I've been adding a "Taking this one..." type of comment to an entry > > I want to claim. > > Sorry I haven't gotten around to this. Beyond being a little burned > out a little bit, I have been a little bit under the weather and a > little occupied with life apart from PostgreSQL, as if there were such > a thing. Anyway, one of the concerns I have about this is that adding > another field to the commitfest_view page seems as though it will > create some layout issues - the leftmost column will get squished. I > could (a) go ahead and do it anyway or (b) do it, but modify the > layout in some unspecified way so that it doesn't impact the format as > much or of course (c) not do it. Any thoughts? > > It would also like to clarify the use case for this a little bit more. > Is this just to track patches which committers are in the process of > committing (or have committed)? Or would a committer potentially set > this on some patch that was still being reviewed, and if so would that > mean "don't review this any more because I'm taking over" or "I'm > planning to pick this up when the review process completes" or > something else?
I am thinking we can just add a new status, "claimed by committer" and not bother about adding a new column with the committer name. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
