Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 14:46 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> "Joshua D. Drake" <j...@commandprompt.com> writes: >>> On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 20:28 -0800, David Fetter wrote: >>>> This is totally separate from the really important question of whether >>>> SE-Linux has a future, and another about whether, if SE-Linux has a >>>> future, PostgreSQL needs to go there. >>> Why would we think that it doesn't? >> Have you noticed anyone except Red Hat taking it seriously? > > I just did a little research and it appears the other two big names in > this world (Novel and Ubuntu) are using something called App Armor.
How much of SE-PgSQL would also complement the App Armor framework? Also, yet another MAC system called Tomoyo from NTT was merged into the linux kernel earlier this year. Is SE-PgSQL orthogonal and/or complimentary to all of those? Since I see MAC features continuing to be added to operating systems, I can certainly imagine they're important to some customers. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
