Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> writes: > On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 23:19 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >> For parity with unique constraints, I think that the message: >> >> operator exclusion constraint violation detected: %s >> >> should be changed to: >> >> conflicting key value violates operator exclusion constraint "%s"
> Done, and updated tests. I'm starting to go through this patch now. I thought the consensus was to refer to them as just "exclusion constraints"? I'm not seeing that the word "operator" really adds anything. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers