On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 13:35 +0000, Greg Stark wrote: > I don't think getting rid of infomask2 wins us 2 bytes so fast. The > rest of those two bytes is natts which of course we still need.
err, yes, OK. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
