Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> But if everyone is happy with just relying on the OS buffer to not fill >> up, let's just drop it.
> The OS buffer is expected to be able to store a large number of > XLogRecPtr messages, because its size is small. So it's also OK > to just drop it. It certainly seems to be something we could improve later, when and if evidence emerges that it's a real-world problem. For now, simple is beautiful. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers