"Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes:
> I'm inclined that it would be no more work to replace the current
> recursively called state engine with something easier to read and
> understand than to try to fix the current oddities. Perhaps
> something along the lines of this?:
> http://vo.astronet.ru/arxiv/dict_regex.html
> I suspect we'd need to get it to use the same regexp code used
> elsewhere in PostgreSQL.
We're certainly not going to start carrying two regexp engines,
so yeah ;-)
I guess if this is proposed as a replacement for the existing parser,
we'd need to see some speed comparisons. I have no idea at all which
is faster.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
