On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, John Summerfield wrote: > On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Stephan Szabo wrote: > > > > of the message this was in response to which appears to be what Lamar was > > responding to. Besides, there's a far cry from a message of constructive > > criticism and the message this was in response to. The point that the > > documentation and reality need to match up is a good one, but saying > > that "It's wrong because it's different from what worked before" isn't > > reasonable. Saying, "This change is unfortunate and did it really have > > to happen and why? And the documentation and the server realities really > > have to match up. Perhaps changing the page first with a note of both > > configurations with an estimated time change for the server would have > > been better/the right way to do this" is reasonable. > > > > How many people use anonymouse CVS? Hundreds? Thousands? Tens of thousands?
Hundreds, maybe ... > You must have been fixing a pretty serious problem to justify > inconveniencing them all. And if it really is that serious, add a word > of explanation (to forestall problem reports) and apology. Ummm, all of these changes and moves were forewarned ... obvious that was before you came on the scene with your "in a perfect world" assessments ... > That is the point of my complaint. If it was just me, I'd shrug my > shoulders and (once I figured out how) get on with it. Obviously it is/was only you, cause nobody else appear to give two shakes ... ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]