Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> BTW, something that's been bothering me a bit with this patch is that we >> now have to link the backend with libpq. I don't see an immediate >> problem with that, but I'm not a packager. Does anyone see a problem >> with that? > > Yeah, I have a problem with that. What's the backend doing with libpq? > It's not receiving this data, it's sending it.
walreceiver is a postmaster subprocess too. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
