On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:47 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The very, very large practical problem with this is that if you decide
>> to change the behavior at any time, the only way to be sure that the WAL
>> receiver is using the right libpq version is to perform a soname major
>> version bump.  The transformations done by libpq will essentially become
>> part of its ABI, and not a very visible part at that.
>
> Not having to change the libpq API would certainly be a big advantage.

Done; I replaced PQgetXLogData and PQputXLogRecPtr with PQgetCopyData and
PQputCopyData.

 git://git.postgresql.org/git/users/fujii/postgres.git
 branch: replication

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to