On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Kurt Harriman <harri...@acm.org> wrote: >> Your worry ii) can be ignored, managing to compile on such >> compilers is already overachievement. > > I think so too. With your opinion added to mine, do we constitute a > consensus of the pg community? Someone might object that a sample of > two individuals is insufficiently representative of the whole, but > away with the pedants: let us not quibble over trifles.
I haven't completely followed this thread, but I think there has been some discussion of making changes to inline that would cause regressions for people using old, crappy compilers, and I think we should avoid doing that unless there is some compelling benefit. I'm not sure what that benefit would be - I don't think "cleaner code" is enough. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
