On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:54:41AM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: > Your code in ecpg.addons calls output_statement() > unconditionally with ECPGst_prepnormal and > output_statement() decides what to do with the > "auto_prepare" global variable. Your code doesn't > seem more readable than mine, but does the same > with the currently existing callers.
It better should do the same. :-) Maybe finding it simpler this way just comes from me being used to the way this part of the source code works. It's essantially the same, I only moved that one auto_prepare test out of the parser. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype: michaelmeskes, Jabber: mes...@jabber.org VfL Borussia! Forca Barca! Go SF 49ers! Use: Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
