On Monday 21 December 2009 04:23:57 Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > On Monday 21 December 2009 02:23:39 Robert Haas wrote: > >> A more important point is whether we really need to make this > >> dependent on Perl 5.6 or later. > > > > I dont see a platform without perl 5.6 where a new enough flex/bison is > > available... > > That argument only holds water if you are willing to follow the same > rules as we use for flex/bison, ie, they are not needed to build from > a source tarball. Otherwise this *is* moving the goalposts on required > tool support. The patch already does that if I understood John correctly.
Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
